<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feature Feature: A simple desktop indicator using $desktop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.conky.be/2009/09/15/feature-feature-a-simple-desktop-indicator-using-desktop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.conky.be/2009/09/15/feature-feature-a-simple-desktop-indicator-using-desktop/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog for Conky, a Lightweight System Monitor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:08:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: londonali1010</title>
		<link>http://blog.conky.be/2009/09/15/feature-feature-a-simple-desktop-indicator-using-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>londonali1010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conky.be/?p=56#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment!  You&#039;re right, using a 50x50px square and resizing it isn&#039;t the most efficient method, especially if you are using a 0.1s update interval, like I did above.

However, I use 50x50px because I have a selection of them saved, ready for scaling and using in backgrounds, that sort of thing! If you&#039;re just doing a one-off, then yes, it&#039;s better to use images at the right size to begin with.

Incidentally, there is a moderate cpu% improvement if you use 10x10px and scale  up, rather than using 50x50px and scale down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment!  You&#8217;re right, using a 50&#215;50px square and resizing it isn&#8217;t the most efficient method, especially if you are using a 0.1s update interval, like I did above.</p>
<p>However, I use 50&#215;50px because I have a selection of them saved, ready for scaling and using in backgrounds, that sort of thing! If you&#8217;re just doing a one-off, then yes, it&#8217;s better to use images at the right size to begin with.</p>
<p>Incidentally, there is a moderate cpu% improvement if you use 10&#215;10px and scale  up, rather than using 50&#215;50px and scale down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subbass</title>
		<link>http://blog.conky.be/2009/09/15/feature-feature-a-simple-desktop-indicator-using-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Subbass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conky.be/?p=56#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Excellent howto, while I run compiz on my normal gnome session I can try this on my openbox session.

A quick question though, if you don&#039;t draw the squares at the size you want them and use the $image flag to scale them, isn&#039;t Conky scaling the four images on *every* refresh, and causing an unnecessary performance hit? (as you may remember from my album art stuff, I don&#039;t like waste) ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent howto, while I run compiz on my normal gnome session I can try this on my openbox session.</p>
<p>A quick question though, if you don&#8217;t draw the squares at the size you want them and use the $image flag to scale them, isn&#8217;t Conky scaling the four images on *every* refresh, and causing an unnecessary performance hit? (as you may remember from my album art stuff, I don&#8217;t like waste) <img src='http://blog.conky.be/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
